The two American presidential candidates faced off again last night with a supporting cast of ordinary voters asking some of the questions and getting a few answers – and mostly hostile rhetoric. Who won the body language debate? Each candidate revealed some true colors. But what they revealed with their body language was so very different that the debate can’t be judged on points. Rather, it comes down to a choice: which president do you want to have?

The distinctions began with the walk-on, before either candidate had a chance to speak. Once again, Clinton walked on confidently, taking the space as her own. She showed that she’s comfortable on the debate stage; her posture was confident, her pace assured. Trump, on the other hand, moved more tentatively, was uncertain about where and how to stand, and ended up behind his chair, still standing, after Clinton had already sat down.

But very quickly Trump took the offensive. He towered over Hillary within the first couple of minutes, moved into her space, and made her feel his physical dominance so strongly that she stood up while he was talking and retreated a few paces. Had Trump been able to keep up that kind of pressure, the debate would have been a rout in his favor.

Ten or fifteen minutes later, however, Trump seemed to lose interest in the debate. He lost focus. He backed down. He retreated back behind his chair. Whenever Clinton was talking, he narrowed and even shut his eyes, grimaced, and swayed back and forth, like a boy who wanted to be excused to go out and play. He was checking out.

Soon, Trump started to wander during Clinton’s answers, sometimes looming behind her in a threatening way, but sometimes seeming to be looking for the exit. Clinton, on the other hand, sat, with her eyes open, focusing on Trump throughout his answers, taking it all in, rarely even reacting beyond a kind of overall disapproval “more in sorrow than in anger.”

The two candidates’ behavior was entirely different during questions from the audience, especially in the second half of the debate. Clinton walked over directly to the questioner, listened to the question, and then answered while staying focused on the voter. Trump, in contrast, often wandered away from the questioner and the question, turning his answer into a personal attack on Clinton, seeming to shut out the questioner in the process.

Throughout the evening, Clinton kept the focus as much as possible on issues, programs, and facts – this is her area of interest and passion. Trump, on the other hand, is motivated by personalities, not programs. He kept turning the attack to Clinton herself, calling her a liar repeatedly, saying that her judgment was bad, and that she had accomplished nothing in her thirty years in public office.

When asked to say one nice thing about the other candidate, Clinton appeared to dodge the issue by praising his children, where Trump genuinely complimented Clinton for being a fighter, not a quitter. That’s something he apparently does respect in her. It was enough of an olive branch that the two candidates were able at the close of the debate to do what they were unable to do at the beginning, so strong was their animus toward one another: shake hands.

Overall, Trump was authentic and consistent in his anger, but unable to maintain his focus for the full 90 minutes. Clinton, on the other hand, was less comfortable with her anger and emotions generally, repeatedly flashing an insincere, angry smile, but was able to stay focused for the entire debate.

Which will you choose? One candidate talked about personality, the other discussed issues. One stayed with the questioners while answering their questions, the other did not. One heard her opponent out on each answer, the other lost interest and focus for many of his opponent’s responses. These are two very different people, as revealed by their body language.

The choice belongs to the voters and it’s a very distinct one. Wherever you end up, please do vote. A president needs to represent all the people.